A function needs to be continuous in order to be differentiable. However the derivative is just another function that might or might not itself be continuous, ergo differentiable. What is the difference between continuous derivative and derivative?
Answers 2
To verify continuity, one can look at a single point $x$ and use local information about $x$ (in particular, $x$ itself) and local information about how $f$ behaves near $x$. For example, if you know that $f$ is bounded on a neighborhood of $x$, that is fair game to use in your recovery of $\delta$. Also, any inequality that $x$ or $f(x)$ satisfies on a tiny neighborhood near $x$ is fair game to use as well. A piecewise continuous function doesn’t have to be continuous at finitely many points in a finite interval, so long as you can split the function into subintervals such that each interval is continuous. Why are there more number of elements in the “Integrable functions set” than “Continuous functions set” (here by elements i mean integrable and continuous functions ofcourse) ???. Can anyone plz help me understand this out in as simple words as possible.
What’s the difference between continuous and piecewise continuous functions?
This statement means there is some person $p$ who owns EVERY car. Thus this person doesn’t depend on the car (since he has all of them, or in other words; given every car, he has it). Others have already answered, but perhaps it would be useful to have at least one of the answers target the elementary calculus level. This property is unrelated to the completeness of the domain or range, but instead only to the linear nature of the operator.
You must log in to answer this question.
A continuous function is a function where the limit exists everywhere, and the function at those points is defined to be the same as the limit. Note that in the second definition, the universal quantifier $\forall c$ now also follows the existential quantifier $\exists \delta$. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. At first glance, it may seem like a.e.-differentiability should be a nice enough property to ensure FTC is true, but there are counterexamples (like the Cantor function).
more stack exchange communities
Yes, a linear operator (between normed spaces) is bounded if and only if it is continuous. So, a bounded operator is always continuous on norm-spaces. Banach space is a norm-space which is complete, thus things are not different there. To see the significance of the quantifier order, continuous delivery maturity model consider the following, where C is the set of cars, P is the set of people, and R is a relation such that cRp means c is owned by p.
- It’s enough to change the value of a continuous function at just one point and it is no longer continuous.
- Then, the definition you provided is exactly saying that Q is absolutely continuous to the ‘default measure’.
- Observe that in the first statement of the example, the universal quantifier precedes the existential quantifier.
- Continuity is something that is extremely sensitive to local and small changes.
- Such a function is not a continuously differentiable.
The difference is in the ordering of the quantifiers.
What is a continuous extension?
Uniform continuity, in contrast, takes a global view—and only a global view (there is no uniform continuity at a point)—of the metric space in question. We can probably find a different condition, but those two counterexamples rule out lots of good tries. Lipschitz continuous, differentiable, and even smooth are insufficient.
The way I like to think of it is that it says that the image under $f$ of a sufficiently small finite collection of intervals is arbitrarily small (where “small” refers to total length). Thus continuity in a certain sense only worries about the diameter of a set around a given point. Whereas uniform continuity worries about the diameters of all subsets of a metric space simultaneously.
The reason for this is because up until then there are no functions you have encountered containing any form of jump discontinuity of the finite nature. As the other answer here says, each interval is continuous. However there are levels of piece-wise continuity which simply put mean that the function is differentiatable fully on those continuous intervals n number of times.
You can think of absolute continuity as a way of shoring up that kind of pathology, i.e. it eliminates so-called singular (in the measure-theory sense) functions. As observed by Siminore, continuity can be expressed at a point and on a set whereas uniform continuity can only be expressed on a set. Reflecting on the definition of continuity on a set, one should observe that continuity on a set is merely defined as the veracity of continuity at several distinct points. In other words, continuity on a set is the “union” of continuity at several distinct points. Reformulated one last time, continuity on a set is the “union” of several local points of view.
In the definition of uniform continuity, $\exists \delta $ precedes neither $x$ nor $c$, therefore it can depend on neither of them, but only on $\epsilon$. A piece-wise continuous function is a bounded function that is allowed to only contain jump discontinuities and fixable discontinuities. These functions almost always occur with the inclusion of floor into the regular set of algebraic functions you are used to in calculus.
- For example, any inequality that every point of $X$ satisfies is fair game to use to recover $\delta$.
- For all $\varepsilon$, there exists such a $\delta$ that for all $x$ something something.
- Let $X$ and $Y$ denote two metric spaces, and let $f$ map $X$ to $Y$.
- What is the difference between continuous derivative and derivative?
Integrability on the other hand is a very robust property. If you make finitely many changes to a function that was integrable, then the new function is still integrable and has the same integral. That is why it is very easy to construct integrable functions that are not continuous. I know that a bounded continuous function on a closed interval is integrable, well and fine, but there are unbounded continuous functions too with domain R , which we cant say will be integrable or not. The derivative of a function (if it exists) is just another function. For all $\varepsilon$, there exists such a $\delta$ that for all $x$ something something.
However, the delta of continuity is decided by the point c, it varies due to the change of c. Let $X$ and $Y$ denote two metric spaces, and let $f$ map $X$ to $Y$. Observe that in the first statement of the example, the universal quantifier precedes the existential quantifier. In the second statement, the universal quantifier follows the existential quantifier.
Difference between continuity and uniform continuity
A continuously differentiable function $f(x)$ is a function whose derivative function $f'(x)$ is also continuous at the point in question. To conclude, for any variables $x,y$, $y$ can depend on $x$ if and only if the universal quantifier for $\forall x$ precedes the existential quantifier for $\exists y$. For all $x$, for all $\varepsilon$, there exist such a $\delta$ that something something. I know that in Definition 4.3.1, $\delta$ can depend on $c$, while in definition 4.4.5, $\delta$ cannot depend on $x$ or $y$, but how is this apparent from the definition? From what appears to me, it just seems like the only difference between Definition 4.3.1 and Definition 4.4.5 is that the letter $c$ was changed to a $y$.
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. However to verify uniform continuity, you can’t zoom in on any particular point. You can only use global information about the metric space and global information about the function $f$; i.e. a priori pieces of information independent of any particular point in the metric space. For example, any inequality that every point of $X$ satisfies is fair game to use to recover $\delta$. If $f$ is Lipschitz, any Lipschitz constant is fair to use in your recovery of $\delta$. These different points of view determine what kind of information that one can use to determine continuity and uniform continuity.